{"id":288,"date":"2015-06-19T22:51:16","date_gmt":"2015-06-19T22:51:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/montanaforestrestoration.wordpress.com\/?page_id=152"},"modified":"2017-05-17T15:50:30","modified_gmt":"2017-05-17T21:50:30","slug":"history","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/home\/about\/history\/","title":{"rendered":"History"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Differences of opinion about National Forest stewardship, and the \u201cwinner take all\u201d structures, have led to decades of polarization among our citizenry and near paralysis on-the-ground. Over time, responsible people on many sides of forest issues concluded the present system was failing \u2013 failing our timber workers and timber-dependent communities, failing the ecological health of our forests, failing our responsibility to future generations. That left a question: Despite our differences, could key parties come to the table to see if there was a \u201czone of agreement\u201d we share, a common ground set of ideas we could build on to generate positive work on the ground?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">In August, 2006, Artemis Common Ground invited nine people from industry, the conservation community, U.S. Forest Service, state of Montana, and the non-profit sector to explore that question. After an all day meeting, everyone concluded that common ground might be created around the idea of on-the-ground restoration: work to restore the health of our National Forests. The group formed a Steering Committee whose mission was to engage more community interests in an effort to develop Restoration Principles and an action plan to have those implemented on the ground.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">In January, 2007, thirty-four representatives of conservationists, motorized users, outfitters, loggers, mill operators, state government and the Forest Service held its first meeting at Lubrecht Experimental Forest in western Montana, facilitated by the National Forest Foundation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">All present agreed the restoration goal was worth pursuing; they agreed to work by consensus\u2014meaning that everyone had to agree before a proposal was accepted; they set August 1st as the deadline to finish their work; and they all personally committed to help get the job done.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">The group was dynamic, and represented a broad range of interests. Success depended on honesty, ability to listen, to disagree respectfully, and most centrally, on learning how to focus on building the \u201czone of agreement.\u201d In such a process, loggers do not become environmental activists and conservationists do not change into timber mill managers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">People retain their different perspectives\u2014but they develop the ability to be able to say, \u201cWe disagree on these issues over there, but we can agree on this specific point. Let\u2019s start with that, and see if we can broaden areas of agreement, and if successful, figure out a better way to make good things happen on the ground.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">That is what the Montana Forest Restoration Working Group did. At their last meeting, August 1, 2007, all recommendations were given final, unanimous approval. Next, the group agreed to change its name to the Montana Forest Restoration Committee (MFRC)\u2014reflecting its new mission to see that the approved Restoration Principles and Implementation Plan are put into practice. Finally, members of the group were asked if they wanted to continue to be involved in the effort by serving on the new MFRC. Every person in the room raised their hand.\u00a0The group published a booklet,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/0B5jrNh3PiR96NzRhdHZsdlZDcVU\/view?usp=sharing\"><em>Restoring\u00a0Montana&#8217;s\u00a0National Forest Lands<\/em><\/a>,\u00a0outlining the process and the\u00a0restoration principles.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Since that August meeting the MFRC Steering Committee has kept up the momentum created by the original group. Three forest-level collaborative groups were formed on the Lolo, Bitterroot and Helena National Forests. Each has been meeting as a volunteer body regularly to accomplish the mission of the MFRC and its Principles and Vision for restoration in Montana.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">In July 2008, the MFRC and Restoration Committee efforts were recognized by Montana\u2018s Governor, Brian Schweitzer, through a letter of appreciation to each of the Committees commending them for their work and dedication.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Also in July 2008, the MFRC was awarded the Regional Forester\u2018s Honor Award for &#8220;Gridlock Breaking.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\">Founding Members (Montana Forest Restoration Working Group)<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Below is a list of the founding members of the MFRC with the professional affiliations they had at the time. The group was\u00a0originally named the Montana Forest Restoration Working Group.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Julia Altemus,<\/strong> Montana Logging Association<br \/>\n<strong>Debbie Austin,<\/strong> U.S. Forest Service<br \/>\n<strong>Len Broberg, <\/strong>Sierra Club<br \/>\n<strong>Dave Bull,<\/strong> U.S. Forest Service<br \/>\n<strong>Caroline Byrd,<\/strong> The Nature Conservancy<br \/>\n<strong>Al Christophersen,<\/strong> Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation<br \/>\n<strong>Tony Colter,<\/strong> Sun Mountain Lumber<br \/>\n<strong>Marnie Criley,<\/strong> Wildlands CPR<br \/>\n<strong>Orville Daniels,<\/strong> Retired U.S.\u00a0Forest Service<br \/>\n<strong>Bob Ekey,<\/strong> The Wilderness Society<br \/>\n<strong>Ellen Engstedt,<\/strong> Montana Wood Products Association<br \/>\n<strong>Pat Flowers,<\/strong> Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife &amp; Parks<br \/>\n<strong>Rick Franke,<\/strong> Smurfit-Stone Container<br \/>\n<strong>Pam Gardiner,<\/strong>\u00a0U.S. Forest Service<br \/>\n<strong>John Gatchell,<\/strong> Montana Wilderness Association<br \/>\n<strong>William Geer,<\/strong> Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership<br \/>\n<strong>Dave Harmon,<\/strong> Backcountry Horsemen<br \/>\n<strong>Bob Harrington,<\/strong> Montana Department of Natural Resources &amp; Conservation<br \/>\n<strong>Dale Harris,<\/strong> Great Burn Study Group<br \/>\n<strong>Jeff Juel,<\/strong> WildWest Institute<br \/>\n<strong>Tim Love,<\/strong> U.S. Forest Service<br \/>\n<strong>Julia Riber,<\/strong> U.S. Forest Service<br \/>\n<strong>Jack Rich,<\/strong> Rich Ranches<br \/>\n<strong>Chuck Roady,<\/strong> FH Stoltze Land &amp; Lumber<br \/>\n<strong>Paul Rumelhart,<\/strong> Kootenai River Development Council<br \/>\n<strong>Gordy Sanders,<\/strong> Pyramid Mountain Lumber<br \/>\n<strong>Dan Thompson,<\/strong> Ravalli County Off-Road Users Association<br \/>\n<strong>Mark Vander Meer,<\/strong> National Network of Forest Practitioners<br \/>\n<strong>Mike Volesky,<\/strong> Governor&#8217;s Office<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\">Conveners<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Brian Kahn,<\/strong> Artemis Common Ground<br \/>\n<strong>Mary Mitsos,<\/strong> National Forest Foundation<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\">Support Staff<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><strong>Karen DiBari,<\/strong> <\/strong>National Forest Foundation<br \/>\n<strong><strong>Chelsea Pennick,<\/strong> <\/strong>National Forest Foundation<strong><span style=\"color: #275f34;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<!--themify_builder_content-->\n<div id=\"themify_builder_content-288\" data-postid=\"288\" class=\"themify_builder_content themify_builder_content-288 themify_builder tf_clear\">\n    <\/div>\n<!--\/themify_builder_content-->\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Differences of opinion about National Forest stewardship, and the \u201cwinner take all\u201d structures, have led to decades of polarization among our citizenry and near paralysis on-the-ground. Over time, responsible people on many sides of forest issues concluded the present system was failing \u2013 failing our timber workers and timber-dependent communities, failing the ecological health of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":286,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-288","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","has-post-title","has-post-date","has-post-category","has-post-tag","has-post-comment","has-post-author",""],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/288\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1217,"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/288\/revisions\/1217"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/montanaforestcollaboration.org\/app\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}